BIRDBRAIN · RFC

Requests for Comment

requests for comment — member-authored, key-anchored, argued in the open, and (when the room agrees) pushed on-chain as a Kusama Wish For Change

• RFC N° 001Draft · gathering comment

  Should Kusama Spend Its Treasury Onboarding Members Instead of Selling KSM?

  Kusama holds ~838,000 KSM and spends it down into dollars. This RFC argues it should spend it into memberships instead — and invites you to argue back, on the record.

• RFC N° 002Draft · gathering comment

  Can Kusama's Infrastructure Providers Become the Ecosystem's Private Inference Layer?

  Decent is about to provision a personal server for every member and collective it onboards, each running heavy creative-AI workloads against open-source models. This RFC argues the inference should be bought from Kusama's own infrastructure providers — paid in dUSD on Kreivo, at ~a third of hyperscaler cost, with cryptographic proof it ran privately — and invites you to argue back, on the record.

• RFC N° 003Draft · gathering comment

  Should Birdbrain Give Itself a Legal Body — and Should It Be a Wyoming UNA, Then a DUNA?

  Birdbrain has 23 members who vote on-chain, no legal body, and a plan to issue graphs. Every US court that has looked at that shape has called it either an unincorporated association or a general partnership — neither of which limits what a member can be made to pay. This RFC argues Birdbrain should register as a Wyoming Unincorporated Nonprofit Association now and elect into a Decentralized UNA at 100 members, examines the alternative Polkadot chose (a Cayman foundation company, $600,000 a year, five human directors), and invites you to argue back, on the record.